About Us
How We Work
We check facts, not opinions.
The claim is reviewed to establish whether it is fact-checkable and/or constitutes hate speech, as opposed to the expression of an opinion.
We consult relevant sources and investigate all sides to the story.
The sources consulted include first and foremost the drafter or quoted individual. Other sources consulted include public data and sources ranging from thematic experts to relevant authorities to ensure all sides of the story are investigated.
We guarantee double verification.
Every story is checked by two fact-checkers to mitigate individual bias and to ensure nothing was forgotten. The story is then reviewed and validated through the team lead.
We publish our fact-checking report based on the available evidence at that point in time.
The fact-checked content will be presented with the relevant rating alongside the narrative and references or proof that justifies it, based on the evidence existing at that point in time.
True
The information is correct and accurate.
Half True
The information is partially correct but incomplete or lacking contextualization.
Unproven
The information cannot be verified at this moment as there is no publicly available evidence that allows to prove or disprove it.
Misleading
The information isn't factual and is deceiving and misinforming.
False
The information is incorrect or fabricated.
Harmful
Harmful and abusive language targeting specific individuals or groups.